#007 . KN Ha (HMs 178 [SM I, P74]), Crescent, impressed ([3.1] x 1.4 x 1.1 cm)

side	inscription/seal impression	transnumeration
a	no seal impression
b	] vacat	vacat
g	2 impressions (H & not H) (CMS II 8.83 [# 161 ] & 85); or both H??)
d	]	]*156

Comments
d. CHIC: The inscription was not put on face c, which was already impressed with the 2 impressions (normally placed on the opposing face a); JGY: cf. #020. It is as if the inscription and impressions were reversed - the impression providing the standard texts (placename and transaction) and the inscription providing the commodity; on #020, the impression provides not only the transaction, but also the commodity.
g2. If we read the engraved images as an inscription, catface-031 or MA-RE , there are Linear A parallels on HT 55a.1 and possibly PH 30.2; a place Ib-NU-MA-RE is also associated with VIN on ZA 5b.1 and ZA 15a.4-5.

JGY normalizes

side	inscription/seal impression	transnumeration	normalization
g2 (CMS II 8.85)		catface-031	MA-RE
d	]	]*156	] VINUM
g1 (# 161 )		044-049	KO-RO 3
a, b	vacat	vacat	vacat

Compare
g2: Linear A: MA-RE (HT 55a.1; PH 30.2?), cf. VINa+SU/ME ... Ib-NU-MA-RE (ZA 5b.1 & ZA 15a.4-4)
d: Linear A: *131 VIN
g1: Linear A: KU-RO ("balance," "total," "paid")